ABSTRACT
Retrograde type A aortic dissection (RTAD) following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a lethal complication. A 54-year-old woman with bovine aortic arch presented with dilatation of the descending aorta due to chronic type B aortic dissection. She underwent TEVAR in zone 2 for closure of the entry site just below the origin of the left subclavian artery. On the day after TEAVR, she showed right hemiparesis, and was diagnosed with cerebral infarction on MRI and RTAD on CT. She underwent an emergent operation. The entry was at the proximal end of the bovine trunk, where the edge of the bare stent stuck out. We performed partial arch replacement with entry resection. Her postoperative course was uneventful. She was transferred to another hospital for rehabilitation 37 days after the surgery.
ABSTRACT
<p>A 42 year-old woman with Marfan syndrome, who had replacement of the ascending aorta for acute aortic dissection several years ago, was found to have distal aortic arch aneurysm. The aneurysm had small entries at cervical arterial branches and large re-entry at the left external iliac artery. It was necessary to perform two-staged operation Bentall procedure with total arch replacement and abdominal aortic replacement with re-entry closure. It was usually performed with a primary entry closure for chronic aortic dissection, but massive invasion was expected. We performed catheter angiography for entry and re-entry, and decided to perform preceding re-entry closure. First, we underwent replacement of the abdominal aorta, and then successfully performed the Bentall procedure with total aortic arch replacement. The catheter angiography was useful for decision-making for medical treatment.</p>
ABSTRACT
An 84-year-old man, who had been given a diagnosis of advanced aortoventricular block 2 years previously, underwent implantation of a pacemaker (PM) through the left subclavian vein. However, 7 months later a skin ulcer developed at the implantation site, but without any evidence of bacterial infection. Therefore, a PTFE-covered PM battery was reimplanted at the same site. Three months later, the skin ulcer recurred and he received a third implantation in the right side. However, another skin ulcer with infection developed in the right side. He was then transferred to our hospital for another PM reimplantation. We covered the battery and the entire lead with PTFE, then placed the PM lead directly into the cardiac muscle, and implanted the PM battery below the rectal muscle under general anesthesia. A patch test 4 months later revealed a positive reaction to nickel and silicon. Finally, we diagnosed pacemaker dermatitis. The patient has remained free of skin ulcers for over 1 year.